Bump csharpier from 0.26.5 to 0.26.7 #200

dependabot · 2023-12-18T01:34:36Z

Bumps csharpier from 0.26.5 to 0.26.7.

Release notes

0.26.7

What's Changed

Keep Field.Method() on the same line when breaking long method chain #1010

0.26.0 introduced changes that broke long invocation chains on fields/properties as well as methods. That change has been reverted after community feedback.
// 0.26.0
var loggerConfiguration = new LoggerConfiguration()
    .Enrich
    .FromLogContext()
    .Enrich
    .WithProperty("key", "value")
    .Enrich
    .WithProperty("key", "value")
    .Enrich
    .WithProperty("key", "value")
    .Enrich
    .WithProperty("key", "value")
    .WriteTo
    .Console(outputTemplate: "template");
// 0.26.7
var loggerConfiguration = new LoggerConfiguration()
.Enrich.FromLogContext()
.Enrich.WithProperty("key", "value")
.Enrich.WithProperty("key", "value")
.Enrich.WithProperty("key", "value")
.Enrich.WithProperty("key", "value")
.WriteTo.Console(outputTemplate: "template");
Full Changelog: belav/csharpier@0.26.6...0.26.7

0.26.6

What's Changed

CSharpier incorrectly reports problems with differing line endings as "The file did not end with a single newline"#1067

If CSharpier was validating that a file was formatted, and that file contained only \n but CSharpier was configured to use \r\n, then it would report the problem as The file did not end with a single newline

CSharpier added support for reading line ending configuration from an .editorconfig which could contain end_of_line = crlf so some users were unknowingly configuring CSharpier to use \r\n

CSharpier now correctly reports the problem as The file contained different line endings than formatting it would result in.

Full Changelog: belav/csharpier@0.26.5...0.26.6

Changelog

Sourced from csharpier's changelog.

# 0.26.7

What's Changed

Keep Field.Method() on the same line when breaking long method chain #1010

0.26.0 introduced changes that broke long invocation chains on fields/properties as well as methods. That change has been reverted after community feedback.
// 0.26.0
var loggerConfiguration = new LoggerConfiguration()
    .Enrich
    .FromLogContext()
    .Enrich
    .WithProperty("key", "value")
    .Enrich
    .WithProperty("key", "value")
    .Enrich
    .WithProperty("key", "value")
    .Enrich
    .WithProperty("key", "value")
    .WriteTo
    .Console(outputTemplate: "template");
// 0.26.7
var loggerConfiguration = new LoggerConfiguration()
.Enrich.FromLogContext()
.Enrich.WithProperty("key", "value")
.Enrich.WithProperty("key", "value")
.Enrich.WithProperty("key", "value")
.Enrich.WithProperty("key", "value")
.WriteTo.Console(outputTemplate: "template");
Full Changelog: belav/csharpier@0.26.6...0.26.7

0.26.6

What's Changed

CSharpier incorrectly reports problems with differing line endings as "The file did not end with a single newline"#1067

If CSharpier was validating that a file was formatted, and that file contained only \n but CSharpier was configured to use \r\n, then it would report the problem as The file did not end with a single newline

CSharpier added support for reading line ending configuration from an .editorconfig which could contain end_of_line = crlf so some users were unknowingly configuring CSharpier to use \r\n

CSharpier now correctly reports the problem as The file contained different line endings than formatting it would result in.

Full Changelog: belav/csharpier@0.26.5...0.26.6

Commits

c8aec14 Release 0.26.7 (#1076)
d47c348 Keep property with method (#1074)
6c8bd40 Update issue templates (#1073)
36b543a Ensure that the plugin always uses \n. (#1069)
f73c2c2 update website
3b738ad Release 0.26.6 (#1071)
510a10b Fixing bug with string differ and simplifying the logic for ending with a sin...
182e890 Update IntegratingWithLinters.md (#1068)
See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

@dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
@dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
@dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
@dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
@dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
@dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
@dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
@dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
@dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
@dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [csharpier](https://github.com/belav/csharpier) from 0.26.5 to 0.26.7. - [Release notes](https://github.com/belav/csharpier/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/belav/csharpier/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](belav/csharpier@0.26.5...0.26.7) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: csharpier dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

guibranco

Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]

guibranco · 2023-12-18T01:35:08Z

@dependabot squash and merge

github-actions · 2023-12-18T01:36:44Z

Qodana for .NET

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [email protected]

Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

codacy-production · 2023-12-18T01:40:22Z

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00%	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (`77a83bd`)	1778	4	0.22%
Head commit (`8c8f7a4`)	1778 (+0)	4 (+0)	0.22% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#200)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation}

AppVeyorBot · 2023-12-18T01:46:34Z

✅ Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.522 completed (commit ba0ffb26fa by @dependabot[bot])

codecov · 2023-12-18T01:46:53Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (77a83bd) 0.22% compared to head (4206df7) 0.22%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 4206df7 differs from pull request most recent head 66f2379. Consider uploading reports for the commit 66f2379 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #200   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.22%   0.22%           
=====================================
  Files        117     117           
  Lines       1778    1778           
  Branches      75      75           
=====================================
  Hits           4       4           
+ Misses      1774    1772    -2     
- Partials       0       2    +2

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

dependabot · 2023-12-18T12:45:01Z

One of your CI runs failed on this pull request, so Dependabot won't merge it.

Dependabot will still automatically merge this pull request if you amend it and your tests pass.

github-actions · 2023-12-18T12:46:45Z

Qodana for .NET

1 new problem were found

Inspection name	Severity	Problems
`Possible 'System.NullReferenceException'`	🔶 Warning	1

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [email protected]

Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

guibranco · 2023-12-18T12:49:08Z

@gstraccini cshapier

gstraccini · 2023-12-18T12:50:05Z

I'm sorry @guibranco, I can't do that. 🥺

codacy-production · 2023-12-18T13:10:37Z

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00%	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (`3c51e24`)	1778	4	0.22%
Head commit (`4206df7`)	1778 (+0)	4 (+0)	0.22% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#200)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation}

AppVeyorBot · 2023-12-18T13:17:08Z

✅ Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.529 completed (commit 4a0c7a1cfa by @guibranco)

guibranco · 2023-12-18T13:17:20Z

@gstraccini csharpier

gstraccini · 2023-12-18T13:18:11Z

Running CSharpier on this branch! 🔧

gstraccini · 2023-12-18T13:18:34Z

✅ CSharpier result:

Error ./Src/VTEX/VTEXWrapper.cs - Was not formatted.
  ----------------------------- Expected: Around Line 81 -----------------------------
                  var assembly = System
                      .Reflection.Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(VTEXWrapper))
                      .GetName();
  ----------------------------- Actual: Around Line 81 -----------------------------
                  var assembly = System
                      .Reflection
                      .Assembly
  
Error ./Src/VTEX/VTEXContext.cs - Was not formatted.
  ----------------------------- Expected: Around Line 267 -----------------------------
                      transaction.TransactionId != null
                      && !transaction.TransactionId.Equals(
                          @"NO-PAYMENT",
  ----------------------------- Actual: Around Line 267 -----------------------------
                      transaction.TransactionId != null
                      && !transaction
                          .TransactionId
  
Error ./Tests/VTEX.Tests/Health/VtexHealthClientTests.cs - Was not formatted.
  ----------------------------- Expected: Around Line 60 -----------------------------
              var result = await clientMock
                  .Object.GetPlatformStatuesAsync(CancellationToken.None)
                  .ConfigureAwait(false);
  ----------------------------- Actual: Around Line 60 -----------------------------
              var result = await clientMock
                  .Object
                  .GetPlatformStatuesAsync(CancellationToken.None)

sonarqubecloud · 2023-12-18T14:47:15Z

Quality Gate passed

The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.

1 New issue
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

AppVeyorBot · 2023-12-18T14:47:24Z

✅ Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.534 completed (commit ee5d772557 by @)

dependabot bot added .NET Pull requests that update .net code dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file nuget Refers to nuget packages packages Packages labels Dec 18, 2023

dependabot bot requested a review from guibranco December 18, 2023 01:34

dependabot bot assigned guibranco Dec 18, 2023

github-actions bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 18, 2023

gstraccini bot approved these changes Dec 18, 2023

View reviewed changes

guibranco approved these changes Dec 18, 2023

View reviewed changes

guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) December 18, 2023 01:35

Merge branch 'main' into dependabot/nuget/csharpier-0.26.7

4206df7

Merge branch 'main' into dependabot/nuget/csharpier-0.26.7

be1df19

CSharpier format

66f2379

github-actions bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 18, 2023

guibranco merged commit e895fe8 into main Dec 18, 2023
17 of 19 checks passed

guibranco deleted the dependabot/nuget/csharpier-0.26.7 branch December 18, 2023 14:47

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Bump csharpier from 0.26.5 to 0.26.7 #200

Bump csharpier from 0.26.5 to 0.26.7 #200

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

guibranco left a comment

guibranco commented Dec 18, 2023

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2023

codacy-production bot commented Dec 18, 2023

AppVeyorBot commented Dec 18, 2023

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 18, 2023

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

guibranco commented Dec 18, 2023

gstraccini bot commented Dec 18, 2023

codacy-production bot commented Dec 18, 2023

AppVeyorBot commented Dec 18, 2023

guibranco commented Dec 18, 2023

gstraccini bot commented Dec 18, 2023

gstraccini bot commented Dec 18, 2023

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 18, 2023

AppVeyorBot commented Dec 18, 2023

Bump csharpier from 0.26.5 to 0.26.7 #200

Bump csharpier from 0.26.5 to 0.26.7 #200

Conversation

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 18, 2023 • edited Loading

0.26.7

What's Changed

Keep Field.Method() on the same line when breaking long method chain #1010

0.26.6

What's Changed

CSharpier incorrectly reports problems with differing line endings as "The file did not end with a single newline"#1067

What's Changed

Keep Field.Method() on the same line when breaking long method chain #1010

0.26.6

What's Changed

CSharpier incorrectly reports problems with differing line endings as "The file did not end with a single newline"#1067

guibranco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

guibranco commented Dec 18, 2023

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Qodana for .NET

codacy-production bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

AppVeyorBot commented Dec 18, 2023

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2023 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 18, 2023

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2023 • edited Loading

Qodana for .NET

guibranco commented Dec 18, 2023

gstraccini bot commented Dec 18, 2023

codacy-production bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

AppVeyorBot commented Dec 18, 2023

guibranco commented Dec 18, 2023

gstraccini bot commented Dec 18, 2023

gstraccini bot commented Dec 18, 2023

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Quality Gate passed

AppVeyorBot commented Dec 18, 2023

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading